Well, I didn't think it would actually come to this. From everything I've read, coupled with the intense scrutiny AZ law enforcement has been under the past 2 years because of Sheriff Arpaio's "Tent City," I am VERY confident that SB1070 goes far above and beyond in ensuring it does NOT authorize racial profiling, nor does it supplant Federal Law.
I find it interesting that the Obama Administration did NOT file suit against AZ for racial profiling. Isn't that exactly what all of the opponents to this Bill are screaming from every mountain top? I have not heard dissension of any other aspect of this Bill, yet the Federal Government's lawsuit doesn't address it EVEN though those were the first words out of Pelosi, Holder and Obama - RACIAL PROFILING!!!
It's clear they're just playing "Hot Button" politics. Why else would a government sue a state for doing nothing more than enforcing the Federal laws? Don't forget where the Federal government is getting the funds to litigate this lawsuit - YOUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS!!! With our government farther in debt than ever before, money that can be better utilized will be expended in frivolous lawsuits against one of our own - could the situation be more ludicrous?
Following is a statement released by Gov. Jan Brewer regarding our government's action against her state. If you'd like more information, check out their website at www.keepazsafe.com.
STATEMENT
Statement by Governor Jan Brewer
PHOENIX – “Today I was notified that the federal government has filed a lawsuit against the State of Arizona. It is wrong that our own federal government is suing the people of Arizona for helping to enforce federal immigration law. As a direct result of failed and inconsistent federal enforcement, Arizona is under attack from violent Mexican drug and immigrant smuggling cartels. Now, Arizona is under attack in federal court from President Obama and his Department of Justice. Today's filing is nothing more than a massive waste of taxpayer funds. These funds could be better used against the violent Mexican cartels than the people of Arizona.
“The truth is the Arizona law is both reasonable and constitutional. It mirrors substantially what has been federal law in the United States for many decades. Arizona’s law is designed to complement, not supplant, enforcement of federal immigration laws. Despite the Department of Justice’s claims in paragraph 62 of today’s lawsuit, Arizona is not trying ‘to establish its own immigration policy’ or ‘directly regulate the immigration status of aliens.’ Arizona Revised Statutes § 11-1051(E) states that the federal government, along with local law enforcement officers authorized by the federal government, can only determine an alien’s immigration status.
Subsection (L) of that same section goes on to state that the law ‘shall be implemented in a manner consistent with federal laws regulating immigration.’
“The irony is that President Obama’s Administration has chosen to sue Arizona for helping to enforce federal immigration law and not sue local governments that have adopted a patchwork of ‘sanctuary’ policies that directly violate federal law. These patchwork local ‘sanctuary’ policies instruct the police not to cooperate with federal immigration officials.
“The best thing government can do is to create a stable, predictable environment, governed by an easily understood set of rules or laws. We do not need to make this more complicated than it already is. We must first and foremost create a secure border. Enhanced trade,economic opportunity and freedom will surely follow.
“I am pleased that President Obama and the Department of Justice did not pursue the
baseless claims of illegal racial profiling in the lawsuit. When signing S.B. 1070, I said, ‘My signature today represents my steadfast support for enforcing the law — both against illegal immigration AND against racial profiling.’ Arizona’s law expressly prohibits unconstitutional racial profiling.
However, words are not enough. For this reason, I ordered the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST) to develop training on the new law for Arizona’s police officers. AZPOST has completed the training course and has published it for the all world to see at www.azpost.state.az.us/SB1070infocenter.htm.
AZPOST has done its job professionally and served Arizona well. “I will not stop fighting to protect the citizens of Arizona, and to defend Arizonans in federal court. I have set up a legal defense fund to pay the substantial legal fees that Arizona has been, and will be, forced to incur as a result of all of these lawsuits.
Contributions to the Border Security and Immigration Defense Fund can be made at www.keepazsafe.com. My legal team will not hesitate to assert the rights of the State of Arizona in this matter. Arizona will ultimately prevail against the lawsuits – including this latest assault by the Obama Administration. Our laws will be found to be constitutional – because that is exactly what they are.”
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Root Cause of Federal Inabiity To Secure Border
COMMENT: Talk about political double-talk?!?!? The only reason Obama is addressing this issue (above the more pressing Gulf issue I might add) is for political purposes, yet he has the audacity to claim it hasn't been reformed yet because of GOP political pressure. What, what? The Republican's (and majority of Americans) don't want to see immigration reform without border security. Obama claims our borders are too vast to secure, yet he is still pushing immigration reform - that amounts to a never-ending cycle of amnesty and illegal overpopulation. I shall comment throughout this article as there are simply too many "hot buttons" to cover before.
ARTICLE:
By DARLENE SUPERVILLE, Associated Press Writer Darlene Superville, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Thursday blamed immigration policy gridlock on "political posturing and special interest wrangling."
In a speech, Obama took Republicans to task, in particular 11 GOP senators who supported recent efforts to improve the immigration system. He did not name any, but told his largely supportive audience at American University that those lawmakers had succumbed to the "pressures of partisanship and election-year politics."
COMMENT: I wish he would have gone on to specifically state what those pressures actually were - probably would learn that they would NOT be re-elected if they granted any form of amnesty without first securing our borders adequately. end comment
Seeking to build new momentum on an issue many advocates hoped would be resolved by this point, Obama laid out his rationale for a comprehensive approach to fixing what he and others, Republicans included, say is a broken immigration system.
He said the problem cannot be solved "only with fences and border patrols" but said the government should be held accountable for its responsibility to secure the border. Obama also said that businesses should face consequences for knowingly employing illegal immigrants. And he said those who enter the country illegally should own up to their actions before they can begin the process of becoming citizens.
COMMENT: What kind of "mamsy-pamsy" statement is this? "...should own up to their actions before they can begin the process..." Does he really think the 11M+ illegals are going to raise their hands and take responsibility BEFORE being granted amnesty? They're not interested in becoming US citizens (just look at how they fly the Mexican flag ABOVE the US flag in our own country); they just want to take what they can from America and ship it back to Mexico. end comment
"The question now is whether we will have the courage and the political will to pass a bill through Congress, to finally get it done," the president said. "I'm ready to move forward, the majority of Democrats are ready to move forward and I believe the majority of Americans are ready to move forward. But the fact is that without bipartisan support, as we had just a few years ago, we cannot solve this problem."
COMMENT: Who destroyed the bipartisan support? He lays the partisan atmosphere at the feet of the Republican party, but ObamaCare demonstrated how much the Dems really care about bipartisanship. The atmosphere was bipartisan when the GOP was the majority, but it doesn't work that way now that Congress is Demoncrat controlled. end comment
"Reform that brings accountability to our immigration system cannot pass without Republican votes," he said. "That is the political and mathematical reality."
In response, Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl, one of the 11 Republican senators Obama alluded to in his talk, said he had a good reason for his position this time around.
"My constituents have said do everything you can to secure the border first," Kyl told Fox News Channel. "It's our job to secure the border, whether or not we end up passing so-called comprehensive immigration reform."
COMMENT: To quote Obama, Kyl's statement IS the "political and mathematical reality." end comment
White House officials say recent developments influenced Obama's decision to give his first formal speech on the issue as president, most notably Arizona's enactment of a tough anti-immigrant law and the reaction to it across the country. But advocates also have been pressing him to give such a speech as a demonstration of his commitment to seeing the effort through.
Obama didn't dwell on the Arizona law in the speech. He called it an understandable byproduct of public frustration with the government's inability to tighten the system, but also said the law is ill-conceived, divisive and would put undue pressure on local authorities.
The law requires police enforcing another statute to clarify a person's immigration status if there's reason to believe that person is in the U.S. illegally. Immigrant advocates want the Justice Department, which is reviewing the law, to sue Arizona to block it from taking effect this month.
In the speech, Obama extolled America's history as a melting pot of immigrants and lauded their many contributions to the nation.
But an Associated Press-GfK Poll conducted in May found 57 percent saying illegal immigrants are mostly a drain on society and 38 percent said they believe immigrants make a contribution. Eight in 10 said the federal government should do more to keep immigrants from illegally entering the U.S.
Obama has endorsed a proposal by Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., that would require illegal immigrants to admit they broke the law, pay fines and back taxes and perform community service to eventually obtain legal status. But Graham since has balked at acting on immigration this year, and no other Senate Republican has come forward.
COMMENT: Why do I feel like Jimmy Carter's back in the White House? The proposal above is just as naive as Carter wanting to unilaterally disarm our nuclear weapons as a testament of faith that the Russians would do the same. What makes anyone believe they will (1) Admit they broke the law, (2) Pay fines and back taxes and, (3) Perform community service? Pay fines with what money? How would we even determine what back taxes they owe? They're being paid under-the-table by employers who know they're breaking the law. Lastly, I don't believe the majority are serious about becoming citizens, so why would they agree to community service? end comment
Some Republicans, like Kyl, are pushing a "border security first" approach focused on enforcement.
"It won't work," Obama said. He said there now are more "boots on the ground" on the U.S.-Mexico border than ever before and that "our borders are just too vast for us to be able to solve the problem only with fences and border patrols."
COMMENT: Oops! He just admitted that a major portion of his reform is not possible. So what is possible? Granting amnesty? YEP Allowing all of them on government programs? YEP Getting them all into the tax-payer supplemented side of ObamaCare? YEP Preventing influx that necessitated AZ SB 1070? NOPE!!! end comment
Obama recently ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to the border to boost security and asked Congress for an additional $600 million to support personnel and improve technology there. More than 500 of those Guard troops are headed for Arizona.
COMMENT: Why send 1200 troops and ask for another $600M if you're convinced the borders are too vast to secure? Does anyone REALLY believe Obama has a clue what he's doing? Does anyone TRULY believe the rhetoric?
ARTICLE:
By DARLENE SUPERVILLE, Associated Press Writer Darlene Superville, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Thursday blamed immigration policy gridlock on "political posturing and special interest wrangling."
In a speech, Obama took Republicans to task, in particular 11 GOP senators who supported recent efforts to improve the immigration system. He did not name any, but told his largely supportive audience at American University that those lawmakers had succumbed to the "pressures of partisanship and election-year politics."
COMMENT: I wish he would have gone on to specifically state what those pressures actually were - probably would learn that they would NOT be re-elected if they granted any form of amnesty without first securing our borders adequately. end comment
Seeking to build new momentum on an issue many advocates hoped would be resolved by this point, Obama laid out his rationale for a comprehensive approach to fixing what he and others, Republicans included, say is a broken immigration system.
He said the problem cannot be solved "only with fences and border patrols" but said the government should be held accountable for its responsibility to secure the border. Obama also said that businesses should face consequences for knowingly employing illegal immigrants. And he said those who enter the country illegally should own up to their actions before they can begin the process of becoming citizens.
COMMENT: What kind of "mamsy-pamsy" statement is this? "...should own up to their actions before they can begin the process..." Does he really think the 11M+ illegals are going to raise their hands and take responsibility BEFORE being granted amnesty? They're not interested in becoming US citizens (just look at how they fly the Mexican flag ABOVE the US flag in our own country); they just want to take what they can from America and ship it back to Mexico. end comment
"The question now is whether we will have the courage and the political will to pass a bill through Congress, to finally get it done," the president said. "I'm ready to move forward, the majority of Democrats are ready to move forward and I believe the majority of Americans are ready to move forward. But the fact is that without bipartisan support, as we had just a few years ago, we cannot solve this problem."
COMMENT: Who destroyed the bipartisan support? He lays the partisan atmosphere at the feet of the Republican party, but ObamaCare demonstrated how much the Dems really care about bipartisanship. The atmosphere was bipartisan when the GOP was the majority, but it doesn't work that way now that Congress is Demoncrat controlled. end comment
"Reform that brings accountability to our immigration system cannot pass without Republican votes," he said. "That is the political and mathematical reality."
In response, Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl, one of the 11 Republican senators Obama alluded to in his talk, said he had a good reason for his position this time around.
"My constituents have said do everything you can to secure the border first," Kyl told Fox News Channel. "It's our job to secure the border, whether or not we end up passing so-called comprehensive immigration reform."
COMMENT: To quote Obama, Kyl's statement IS the "political and mathematical reality." end comment
White House officials say recent developments influenced Obama's decision to give his first formal speech on the issue as president, most notably Arizona's enactment of a tough anti-immigrant law and the reaction to it across the country. But advocates also have been pressing him to give such a speech as a demonstration of his commitment to seeing the effort through.
Obama didn't dwell on the Arizona law in the speech. He called it an understandable byproduct of public frustration with the government's inability to tighten the system, but also said the law is ill-conceived, divisive and would put undue pressure on local authorities.
The law requires police enforcing another statute to clarify a person's immigration status if there's reason to believe that person is in the U.S. illegally. Immigrant advocates want the Justice Department, which is reviewing the law, to sue Arizona to block it from taking effect this month.
In the speech, Obama extolled America's history as a melting pot of immigrants and lauded their many contributions to the nation.
But an Associated Press-GfK Poll conducted in May found 57 percent saying illegal immigrants are mostly a drain on society and 38 percent said they believe immigrants make a contribution. Eight in 10 said the federal government should do more to keep immigrants from illegally entering the U.S.
Obama has endorsed a proposal by Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., that would require illegal immigrants to admit they broke the law, pay fines and back taxes and perform community service to eventually obtain legal status. But Graham since has balked at acting on immigration this year, and no other Senate Republican has come forward.
COMMENT: Why do I feel like Jimmy Carter's back in the White House? The proposal above is just as naive as Carter wanting to unilaterally disarm our nuclear weapons as a testament of faith that the Russians would do the same. What makes anyone believe they will (1) Admit they broke the law, (2) Pay fines and back taxes and, (3) Perform community service? Pay fines with what money? How would we even determine what back taxes they owe? They're being paid under-the-table by employers who know they're breaking the law. Lastly, I don't believe the majority are serious about becoming citizens, so why would they agree to community service? end comment
Some Republicans, like Kyl, are pushing a "border security first" approach focused on enforcement.
"It won't work," Obama said. He said there now are more "boots on the ground" on the U.S.-Mexico border than ever before and that "our borders are just too vast for us to be able to solve the problem only with fences and border patrols."
COMMENT: Oops! He just admitted that a major portion of his reform is not possible. So what is possible? Granting amnesty? YEP Allowing all of them on government programs? YEP Getting them all into the tax-payer supplemented side of ObamaCare? YEP Preventing influx that necessitated AZ SB 1070? NOPE!!! end comment
Obama recently ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to the border to boost security and asked Congress for an additional $600 million to support personnel and improve technology there. More than 500 of those Guard troops are headed for Arizona.
COMMENT: Why send 1200 troops and ask for another $600M if you're convinced the borders are too vast to secure? Does anyone REALLY believe Obama has a clue what he's doing? Does anyone TRULY believe the rhetoric?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)